UTILIZAÇÃO DE RESINAS COMPOSTA, FRESADA E IMPRESSA POR CIRURGIÕES-DENTISTAS EM CLÍNICAS PRIVADAS DE SALVADOR - BA: PREFERÊNCIA, INDICAÇÕES E LIMITAÇÕES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v24i4.70562

Keywords:

Dentistry, Composite Resin, Dental Materials, Three-Dimensional Printing, Computer-Aided Design

Abstract

Introduction: The growing demand for aesthetic dental treatments has driven the development and clinical application of new restorative materials, such as direct composite resins, milled resins, and 3D-printed resins. Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the preferences, indications, and limitations related to the use of these materials by dentists working in private dental offices in the city of Salvador, Bahia. Methodology: A structured questionnaire was applied to 50 dental professionals practicing in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. The responses were organized and systematized for quantitative and descriptive analysis. Results: The study revealed that direct composite resin remains the most commonly used material due to its lower cost, ease of application, and conservative approach. On the other hand, milled resins were preferred in cases requiring greater mechanical strength and aesthetic predictability, while printed resins were valued for their practicality and cost-effectiveness, especially in temporary restorations. Despite the growing interest in digital technologies, all participants emphasized that clinical experience remains the main factor in choosing the restorative technique. Conclusions: The results highlight the need for further clinical and laboratory studies to provide evidence-based guidance on the best indications and performance of these materials in dental practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Santos, I. F. B. dos ., Rossi, M. A. ., & Lima, M. J. P. . (2026). UTILIZAÇÃO DE RESINAS COMPOSTA, FRESADA E IMPRESSA POR CIRURGIÕES-DENTISTAS EM CLÍNICAS PRIVADAS DE SALVADOR - BA: PREFERÊNCIA, INDICAÇÕES E LIMITAÇÕES. Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences, 24(4), 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v24i4.70562

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>