Organizações & Sociedade https://revbaianaenferm.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes <p>O&amp;S is a quarterly publication of NPGA - the Postgraduate Center in Administration, at the Federal University of Bahia. Its objective is to foster dialogue and innovation in understanding organizations, through the publication of research that adds value to society and is socially significant. O&amp;S has a five-stage blind peer review process and welcomes two types of articles: theoretical development and empirical research.<br />Area of ​​knowledge: Applied Social Sciences – Qualis A2: Administration, Accounting Sciences, Tourism<br />ISSN(online): 1984-9230 - Periodicity: Quarterly</p> en-US <p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" rel="license" target="_new"><img src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/88x31.png" alt="Licença Creative Commons" /></a></p><p>This work is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0</a> License.</p><p>The O&amp;S adopts a Creative Commons Attributions License 4.0 in all published works, except where specifically indicated by copyright holders.</p> oes.revista@gmail.com (Revista Organizações & Sociedade) oes.revista@gmail.com (Francine Garbelotti) Thu, 14 May 2026 00:23:30 +0000 OJS 3.2.1.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 The Trajectory of Accountability in Brazilian Public Administration: From Redemocratization to Democratic Backsliding during Bolsonaro’s Presidency https://revbaianaenferm.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/64693 <p><span class="fontstyle0">This study aims to analyze the theoretical, conceptual, and institutional development of accountability in Brazil, from the period of redemocratization to the Bolsonaro administration. It is a theoretical essay that examines accountability from a public administration perspective, identifying legal and institutional advances that enabled the materialization of the concept in the following decades, and from a political science perspective, revisiting the theoretical-conceptual framework of democratic accountability, anchored in modern democratic theory, exploring its political dimension and its relationship with power dynamics within the Brazilian democratic context. The timeframe adopted spans from the 1990s, taking Campos’s work as a reference, through Bolsonaro’s presidency (2019-2022), in order to understand the extent to which this period aligns with the structural characteristics identified by Campos, and how it affected the advancement and consolidation of democratic accountability in Brazil. Although the national literature highlights persistent difficulties in implementing accountability in Brazilian public administration, over the years there has been a gradual evolution of the concept in legal, institutional, and societal terms, as democratic foundations were progressively restored. Bolsonaro’s presidency, however, represents a period marked by attempts to revert to the parameters initially described by Campos, such as authoritarianism and the delegitimization of institutions. <br /></span></p> José Antonio Gomes de Pinho, Renata Santos Copyright (c) 2026 Organizações & Sociedade https://revbaianaenferm.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/64693 Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000 Alternative Food Networks: Characteristics and Dynamics that Define Alternativeness in the Academic Production https://revbaianaenferm.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/65218 <p><span class="fontstyle0">This article analyzes the characteristics and dynamics that define alternative food networks (AFNs) as an alternative to the conventional food system. The relevance of the study lies in the growing importance of AFNs as transformative agents that challenge the hegemony of industrial agriculture and point to more equitable, sustainable, and integrated food systems. A systematic review of 106 articles indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases was conducted. The methodology involved searching for specific terms, reading the full texts, and creating a database for systematization and qualitative analysis. As a result, 34 characteristics attributed to AFNs were identified, with the ten most cited being: close relationships between actors; economic, social, and environmental concerns; an emphasis on location; differentiated and diverse organizational structures; education, conscious choice, and responsible consumption; shared values; a challenge to the dominant paradigm; activism and political awareness; and challenges to the maintenance and adaptability of AFNs and unconventional agricultural practices. The analysis of the results indicates that alternativeness is not a fixed attribute but rather a concept that is interpreted in various ways, reflecting the coexistence of different values, practices, and organizational structures. In this sense, the study systematically organizes these elements and the findings, offering a comprehensive view of the various ways in which alternativeness is conceived in AFNs. This broadens the theoretical understanding of the phenomenon and provides support for future investigations that wish to further the debate in different contexts.<br /></span></p> Tânia Soares da Silva Copyright (c) 2026 Organizações & Sociedade https://revbaianaenferm.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/65218 Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000