Mapeando o inexistente: os estudos de recepção cinematográfica, por que não interessam à Universidade brasileira?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/contemporanea.v3i2.3462Keywords:
Recepção cinematográfica, Cinema brasileiro, Teoria do cinemaAbstract
This paper discusses the theoretical and the political/institutional aspects which were considered responsible for the absolute marginalization of the interest in cinematic reception in film studies in Brazil, such as: 1)the survival of Glauberian¬ism as the theoretical and aesthetical canon; 2)the absence of political-academic wish to dialogue with the international theoretical and methodological output - such as cultural studies and cognitivism - which, appearing in the 1980s, oppose, in the field of spectatorship, the modernist textualism typical of cinema studies in the 1970s; and 3) the hypertrophy and anticontextualism of the field of film analysis, preventing the look towards the actual spectator. At the end, as part of a movement of rupture with the present situation, the article presents ongoing research project, named “Discourses of the audience on Brazilian cinema”.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors publishing in this journal must agree to the following copyright terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal Contemporanea and the Faculty of Communication of the Federal University of Bahia the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website), as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.