Profile of publications on Journalism epistemology: a mapping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/contemporanea.v24i1.66569Keywords:
Journalism theories, knowledge, journalism epistemology, objectivity, subjectivityAbstract
This study aimed to understand the profile of publications on the epistemology of journalism in scientific works published in the last five years (2019-2024) through a mapping review study. For data organization, the Ryyan software was used; for data analysis, descriptive frequency analyses were conducted using SPSS software (version 2.3). As a result, 147 works were mapped, authored by 238 authors, with institutional affiliations in 36 different countries, primarily located in Europe, the USA, Canada, and Latin America. The vast majority of the investigations are theoretical, employing bibliographic research as the method and Journalism Theories as the foundational discipline. It is concluded that the works are highly concentrated in a few regions and have a low frequency of dialogue with disciplines from different fields of knowledge outside of Social Communication.
Downloads
References
ADIPRASETIO, Justito et al. Epistemological problems in fact-checking practice: evidence from Indonesia. Media Practice and Education, v. 26, p. 36-57, 2024. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2024.2341338
BORGES-REY, Eddy. Towards an epistemology of data journalism in the devolved nations of the United Kingdom: changes and continuities in materiality, performativity and reflexivity. Journalism, v. 21, n. 7, p. 915-932, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/146488491769386
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Os usos sociais da ciência: por uma sociologia clínica do campo científico. São Paulo: Editora da Unesp, 2004.
CAPILLA, Pablo. Pos-truth as a mutation of epistemology in journalism. Media e Communication, v. 9, n. 1, p. 313-322, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3529
DWORZNIK-HOAK, Gretchen. Emotional labor during disaster coverage: exploring expectations for emotional display. Journalism Practice, v. 16, n. 5, p. 864-882, 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1816858
GALVÃO, Taís Freire; PEREIRA, Maurício Gomes. Revisões sistemáticas e outros tipos de síntese: comentários à série metodológica publicada na Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, v. 31, n. 3, e2022422, 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222022000300023
GARCEZ, Bibiana. Repensando a ética jornalística tradicional: posicionamentos editoriais no jornalismo feminista brasileiro contemporâneo. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, v. 1, n. 146, p. 199-216, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v1i146.4392
HENRIQUES, Rafael Paes. Entendimentos de objetividade entre os jornalistas brasileiros: o que se pretende ser, quando se quer ser objetivo. Brazilian Journalism Research, v. 17, n. 3, p. 792-831, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v17n3.2021.1410
MABROOK, Radwa. Between journalist authorship and user agency: exploring the concept of objectivity in VR journalism. Journalism Studies, v. 22, n. 2, p. 209-224, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1813619
MAROCCO, Beatriz. Outra via para interrogar as práticas jornalísticas. Galáxia, n. 46, p. 1-17, 2021. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-2553202150598
MESSAGI JÚNIOR, Mário. Fato vs. texto: como a “objetividade” oculta o caráter discursivo do jornalismo. Bakthiana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso, v.17, n. 1, p. 166-186, 2022.
MIGUEL, Luis Felipe. O jornalismo no novo ambiente comunicacional: uma reavaliação da noção do “jornalismo como sistema perito”. Tempo Social. Revista de Sociologia da USP, v. 34, n. 2, p. 195-216, 2022. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2022.195368
MOHER, David; STEWART, Lesley; SHEKELLE, Paul. All in the family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more. Systematic Reviews, v. 4, n. 183, 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0163-7
ROBINSON, Sue; CULVER, Kathleen Bartzen. When White reporters cover race: news media, objectivity and community (dis)trust. Journalism, v. 20, n. 3, p. 375-391, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849166635
RODRÍGUEZ PÉREZ, Carlos. Una reflexión sobre la epistemología del fact-checking journalism: retos y dilemas. Revista de Comunicación, v. 19, n.1, p. 243-258, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.26441/RC19.1-2020-A14
SCHAETZ, Nadja; LISCHKA, Juliane A.; LAUGWITZ, Laura. Datafication of journalism: how data elites and epistemic infrastructures change news organizations. Digital Journalism, v. 13, n. 4, p. 677-695, 2025. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2235601
STEINER, Linda. A feminist ethics for journalism. In: WARD, S. J. A. (org.). Handbook of Global Media Ethics. Springer, 2021. p. 185-206.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rafael da Silva Paes Henriques, Catarina Gordiano Paes Henriques

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal must agree to the following copyright terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal Contemporanea and the Faculty of Communication of the Federal University of Bahia the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0), which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website), as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.