Conceito de Ativo e seus Reflexos na Contabilização de Elementos Patrimoniais: Um Olhar para o Setor Público e o Terceiro Setor

Authors

  • Rayane Farias dos Santos Universidade de Brasília
  • Jorge Katsumi Niyama Universidade de Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/rcufba.v17i1.56199

Keywords:

Estrutura Conceitual, Ativo, Setor Público, Terceiro Setor

Abstract

O presente estudo discute os efeitos do conceito de ativo para a contabilização de elementos patrimoniais do setor público e do terceiro setor, tomando por base a necessidade de responsabilidade sobre a gestão desses elementos. Foi realizada uma revisão literária sobre a evolução histórica do conceito de ativo no sentido geral, o conceito de ativo no setor público e no terceiro setor e suas implicações. Utilizou-se como base normativa, as diretrizes contábeis criadas pelos órgãos IASB, FASB e IPSASB, e quanto ao contexto brasileiro, as NBCs T 16. A base literária é composta por 24 artigos encontrados na base da scopus e do scholar google. Por meio dos achados literários e da discussão proposta é possível compreender que cada setor possui características específicas que precisam ser levadas em consideração. A conceituação e contabilização de ativos mais específicos enfrenta inúmeros desafios gerenciais, legais, políticos, econômicos e sociais. Tais desafios mostram que é necessária uma abordagem holística e interdisciplinar das questões levantadas. Os normatizadores e profissionais contábeis não devem ignorar a contabilização de elementos patrimoniais que não satisfaçam a definição de ativo, é necessário buscar soluções a partir da teoria contábil e da ressignificação do conceito básico de elementos patrimoniais. É nesse sentido que o objetivo do estudo contribui com a literatura e os normativos contábeis, ao examinar a adequação e utilidade das prescrições contábeis, fazendo uma comparação das necessidades dos usuários contábeis em relação a conceituação atual de ativo e sua adequação as especificidades de cada setor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, B., Mussari, R., & Jones, R. (2011). The diversity of accrual policies in local government financial reporting: an examination of infrastructure, art and heritage assets in Germany, Italy and the UK. Financial Accountability & Management, 27(2), 107-133.

Alves, A. M. D. M. (2021). Uma análise da mudança do conceito do ativo na nova estrutura conceitual do IASB: qual o efeito do lobbying dos grupos de interesse? Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.

Association of Accounting Technicians (AAT, 2014). Discussion Paper and comment letters - A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Comment Letter nº144. Disponível em: <https://www.ifrs.org/projects/2018/conceptual-framework/comment-letters-projects/dp-review-of-conceptual-framework/#comment-letters>. Acesso em: 09 mai. 2022.

Aversano, N., & Christiaens, J. (2012). Governmental Financial Reporting of Heritage Assets in The Perspective of User Needs. Social Science Research Network. http://papers. ssrn. com. Diakses tanggal, 29.

Aversano, N., Christiaens, J., Polcini, P. T., & Sannino, G. (2019). Accounting for heritage assets: An analysis of governmental organization comment letters on the IPSAS consultation paper. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2/3), 307-322.

Aversano, N., Christiaens, J., & Van Thielen, T. (2019). Does IPSAS meet heritage assets’ user needs?. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 279-288.

Barton, A. (2005). The conceptual arguments concerning accounting for public heritage assets: a note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(3), 434-440.

Biondi, L., Grandis, F. G., & Mattei, G. (2021). Heritage assets in financial reporting: a critical analysis of the IPSASB's consultation paper. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(5), 533-551.

Cade, N. L., Koonce, L., Mendoza, K. I., Rees, L., & Tokar, M. B. (2019). Assets and liabilities: When do they exist?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(2), 553-587.

Carvalho, R. D. M. F., Lima, D. V., & Ferreira, L. O. G. (2012). Processo de reconhecimento e mensuração do ativo imobilizado no setor público face aos padrões contábeis internacionais: um estudo de caso na Anatel. Revista Universo Contábil, 8(3), 62-81.

Chen, J. (2021). Public Goods: Re-examination, Related Concepts and Distinctions. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 251). EDP Sciences.

Dennis, I. (2019). The Conceptual Framework–A ‘Long and Winding Road’…. Accounting in Europe, 16(3), 256-289.

FASB, Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2021). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No.8: Chapter 4, Elements of Financial Statements.Connecticut: Fasb, 2021. Disponível em: CONCEPTS STATEMENT NO. 8—CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING—CHAPTER 8, NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (fasb.org). Acesso em: 14 abr. 2022.

Hooper, K., Kearins, K., & Green, R. (2005). Knowing “the price of everything and the value of nothing”: accounting for heritage assets. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(3), 410–433.

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2010) Exposure Draft Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: The Reporting Entity (ED/2010/2).

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2013). Discussion Paper: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Disponível em:<https://www.ifrs.org/projects/2018/conceptual-framework/comment-letters-project s/dpreview-of-conceptual-framework/>. Acesso em: 12 mai. 2022.

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2013). The IFRS Foundation Annual Report. Disponível em: < https://www.ifrs.org/about-us/who-we-are/#annual-reports> Acesso em: 12 mai. 2022.

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2015). Exposure Draft: Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Disponível em: <https://www.ifrs.org/proj ects/2018/conceptual-framework/comment-letters-projects/ed-conceptual-framework/# consultation>. Acesso em: 12 mai. 2022.

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2015). The IFRS Foundation Annual Report. Disponível em: < https://www.ifrs.org/about-us/who-we-are/#annual-reports> Acesso em: 12 ma. 2022.

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2018). Conceptual Framework Project Summary. Disponivel em: < https://www.ifrs.org/projects/2018/conceptual-framework/#supporting-material>. Acesso em: 12 mai. 2022.

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2018). Feedback Statement. Disponível em: < https://www.ifrs.org/projects/2018/conceptual-framework/#supporting-material>. Acesso em: 12 mai. 2022.

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2018). Snapshot: Dicussion Paper. Disponivel em: < https://www.ifrs.org/projects/2018/conceptual-framework/#supporting-material>. Acesso em: 12 mai. 2022.

IASB, International Accounting Standards Board (2018). Snapshot: Exposure Draft. Disponivel em: < https://www.ifrs.org/projects/2018/conceptual-framework/#supporting-material>. Acesso em: 12 mai. 2022.

IFAC, International Federation of Accountants, International Public Sector Accounting Standards. IPSAS 17: Property, Plant and equipment, Dec, 2009. Disponível em: <http://web.ifac.org/media/publications/0/2011-ifac-handbook-of-inter/ipsas-17-proper ty-plant-3.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 mai. 2022.

IPSASB, International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (2006), Public Sector Conceptual Framework. Project Brief: Collaborative project of the IPSASB and National Standard Setters and similar organizations, December.

IPSASB, International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (2022). Exposure Draft (ED) 81, Conceptual Framework Update: Chapter 3, Qualitative Characteristics and Chapter 5, Elements in Financial Statements, January. Disponível em: Exposure Draft (ED) 81, Proposed Update to Conceptual Framework | IFAC (ipsasb.org). Acesso em: 15 abr. 2022.

CFC, Conselho Federal de Contabilidade (2002). ITG 2002 (R1) Entidade sem Finalidade de Lucros. Disponível em: ITG2002(R1).pdf (cfc.org.br). Acesso em: 14 set. 2023.

KPMG (2015). Comment Letter nº199. Disponível em: <https://www.ifrs.org/projects/2018/conceptual-framework/comment-letters-projects/ed-conceptual-framework/#comment-letters>. Acesso em: 18 mai. 2022.

Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Some Like it Non-Financial...Politicians’ and managers’ views on the importance of performance information. Public Management Review, 14(7), 903–922.

Lutsyk, J., Diachenko, S., Kyrychenko, S., Kotsyuruba, V., & Tkach, I. (2020). Accounting policy of the government sector entity at the current stage of accounting systems development in accordance with international standards. VUZF Review, 5(1), 38-42.

Mala, R., & Chand, P. (2015). Commentary on phase A of the revised conceptual framework: Implications for global financial reporting. Advances in accounting, 31(2), 209-218.

Mashiter, C. F. (2019). Unveiling the role (s) of informal third sector deliverers: towards a conceptual framework to understand the process of social value creation among informal third sector groups. Doctor of Philosophy. University of Salford (United Kingdom).

Mohan, J., & Bennett, M. R. (2019). Community-level impacts of the third sector: Does the local distribution of voluntary organizations influence the likelihood of volunteering?. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(4), 950-979.

Paton, W. A. (1922). Accounting theory, with special reference to the corporate enterprise. Ronald Press.

Pires, C. B., Ribeiro, D. C., Niyama, J. K., & Matias-Pereira, J. (2017). Heritage Assets: desafios para a sua mensuração. Universitas: Gestão e TI, 7(1).

Rawluk, A., Ford, R., Anderson, N., & Williams, K. (2019). Exploring multiple dimensions of values and valuing: a conceptual framework for mapping and translating values for social-ecological research and practice. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1187-1200.

Ryan, C., Mack, J., Tooley, S., & Irvine, H. (2014). Do not‐for‐profits need their own conceptual framework?. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(4), 383-402

Salamon, L. M., Haddock, M. A., & Toepler, S. (2022). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Theorizing the Third Sector: Embedding Statistical and Methodological Developments Awaiting Broader Scholarly Take-up. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1-11.

Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2014). The discretionary use of performance information by different local government actors–Analysing and comparing the predictive power of three factor sets. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 637–658.

Western University (2014). Comment Letter nº35. Disponível em: https://www.ifrs.org/projects/2018/conceptual-framework/comment-letters-projects/dp-review-of-conceptual-framework/#comment-letter.

Wolf, A., Christiaens, J., & Aversano, N. (2021). Heritage assets in the due process of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). Public Money & Management, 41(4), 325-335.

Zeff, S. A. (1999). The evolution of the conceptual framework for business enterprises in the United States. Accounting Historians Journal, 26(2), 89-131.

Published

2023-12-06

How to Cite

Santos, R. F. dos, & Katsumi Niyama, J. . (2023). Conceito de Ativo e seus Reflexos na Contabilização de Elementos Patrimoniais: Um Olhar para o Setor Público e o Terceiro Setor . Revista De Contabilidade Da UFBA, 17(1), e2312. https://doi.org/10.9771/rcufba.v17i1.56199