ETHICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES UNDERLYING INTERVENTION TO HELP WILD ANIMALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/rbda.v21i0.72693Palavras-chave:
Ambientalismo abolicionista; Educação; Moralidade; Especismo seletivo; Senciência.Resumo
This article analyzes some arguments in favor of helping animals who suffer in nature in the light of abolitionist environmentalism. According to several authors, wild animals should be recipients of moral consideration. This reasoning is indisputably correct, and several pro-intervention arguments are quite rich on a philosophical level. However, many arguments that seek to refute the ecological risks underlying intervention to help these animals are either digressive or lack solid ecological/scientific foundations. Population dynamics present shocking figures about lives whose existence is brief and full of suffering. But it also unveils the complexity inherent to ecological processes and the possible unforeseen consequences of intervention in nature, including potentially speciesist practices. Most natural ecosystems today have already undergone a high degree of anthropogenic disturbance. This makes the outcomes of interventions even more unpredictable. Epistemological issues are also addressed, including the alleged dichotomy between moral agents and moral patients and the anthropocentric bias underlying intervention. Therefore, it is suggested that positive rights for wild animals be strengthened through greater investment in existing welfare practices, along with other cutting-edge ideas such as granting them property rights. A new legislation, law enforcement and animal abolitionist education play a key role in this paradigm shift.
Downloads
Referências
ACHBAR, Mark; ABBOTT, Jennifer. (Directors). The corporation (Film). Big Picture Media Corporation; Mongrel Media. Toronto International Film Festival, Canada, 2003, 144 min.
BALCOMBE, Jonathan. Second nature: The inner lives of animals. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2010.
BALCOMBE, Jonathan. What a fish knows: The inner lives of our underwater cousins. New York: Scientific American/FSG. 2016.
BARLOW, Connie. (Ed.). From Gaia to selfish genes: Selected writings in the life sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1992.
BAR-ON, Yinon; PHILLIPS, Rob; MILO, Ron. The biomass distribution on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), New Brunswick, v. 115, n. 25, p. 6506-6511, jun. 2018. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1711842115. Access: 01 mar.2026. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711842115
BARRON, Andrew B; KLEIN, Colin. What insects can tell us about the origins of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), New Brunswick, v. 113, n. 18, p. 4900-4908, may.2016. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/content/113/18/4900/. Access: 01 mar.2026. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520084113
BEKOFF, Marc. The emotional lives of animals: a leading scientist explores animal joy, sorrow, and empathy - and why they matter. Novato: New World Library. 2007.
BRADSHAW, Karen. Animal Property Rights. University of Colorado Law Review, v. 89 n. 3, p. 809-861. 2018. Available at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/lawreview/vol89/iss3/3. Access: 01 mar.2026.
BRINK, Henry; PURCELL, Brad; LETNIC, Mike, et al. Pets and pests: a review of the contrasting economics and fortunes of dingoes and domestic dogs in Australia, and a proposed new funding scheme for non-lethal dingo management. Wildlife Research, v. 46, n. 5, p. 365-377, jul. 2019. Available at: https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/items/3e96c802-27ed-48f4-9889-5d3360b7d845. Access: 01 mar.2026.DOI: 10.1071/WR19030
CAPRA, Frijof. The web of life – a new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books. 1996.
College of Charleston. (n.d.). Duties and Priority Principles of Taylor's Biocentric Egalitarian Individualism. Available at: https://hettingern.people.charleston.edu/Environmental_Ethics/Taylor_Priority_Principles.htm. Access: 01 mar.2026.
CLAPHAM, Wentworth. Natural ecosystems. New York: Collier-Macmillan. 1973.
CUNHA, Luciano. Razões para ajudar: o sofrimento dos animais selvagens e suas implicações éticas. Curitiba: Appris. 2022.
DE WAAL, Frans. Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? London: Granta Books. 2017.
ENGEL, Cindy. Heal Thyself. The Ecologist, London, v. 32, n. 3, p. 34-38, abr. 2002.
FARIA, Catia. (2023). Vulnerability and the ethics of environmental enhancement. Ethics, Policy & Environment, v. 26, n. 2, p. 179–197, apr.2023. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370037161_Vulnerability_and_the_Ethics_of_Environmental_Enhancement. Access: 01 mar.2026. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2023.2200725
FRANCIONE, Gary. Introduction to Animal Rights: your child or the dog? Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 2000.
GITTINS, Jamie. Invertebrate sentience: A review of the neuroscientific literature. Effective Altruism Forum. jul.2019. Available at: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/BgpGHcfu9xryRywsL/invertebrate-sentience-a-review-of-the-neuroscientific. Access: 01 mar.2026.
GONÇALVES, Carlos W. P. Os (des)caminhos do meio ambiente. São Paulo: Contexto. 1989.
GOODALL, Jane. Reason for hope: A spiritual journey. New York: Grand Central Publishing. 1999.
Governo do Paraná. AMESE. Spike e Rambo: Os cães que fizeram história no direito animal brasileiro. May 8, 2025. Available at: https://www.amese.pr.gov.br/Audio/Spike-e-Rambo-Os-caes-que-fizeram-historia-no-direito-animal-brasileiro. Access: 02 mar.2026.
HISS, Tony. Can the world really set aside half of the planet for wildlife? Smithsonian Magazine. Sep. 2014. Available at: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/can-world-really-set-aside-half-planet-wildlife-180952379/. Access: 01 mar.2026.
HORTA, Oscar. Animal suffering in nature: the case for intervention. Environmental Ethics, v. 39, n.3, p.261–279, 2017. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324967706_Animal_Suffering_in_Nature_The_Case_for_Intervention. Access: 03 mar.2026.DOI: 10.5840/enviroethics201739320
International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Have we entered the “Anthropocene”? oct. 2010. Available at: http://www.igbp.net/news/opinion/opinion/haveweenteredtheanthropocene.5.d8b4c3c12bf3be638a8000578.html. Access: 01 mar.2026.
JOHNSON, Jardes. Macaco-prego grita enquanto é sufocado por sucuri em MT. G1/MT. Jan 28, 2025. Available at: https://g1.globo.com/mt/mato-grosso/noticia/2025/01/28/macaco-prego-grita-enquanto-e-sufocado-por-sucuri-em-mt-video.ghtml. Access: 01 mar.2026.
JOY, Melanie. Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. Berkeley: Conari Press. 2010.
LIBNI, Thais. Macaco-prego agoniza por socorro em ‘abraço’ de sucuri gigante, e comove turistas que o salvam da morte. G1/MS. Aug 29, 2023. Available at: https://g1.globo.com/ms/mato-grosso-do-sul/noticia/2023/08/29/macaco-prego-agoniza-por-socorro-em-abraco-de-sucuri-gigante-e-comove-turistas-que-o-salvam-da-morte-video.ghtml. Access: 28 Feb. 2026.
LORIA, Joe. Veal isn’t the only baby animal we eat. Mercy for Animals. Dec 2. 2016. Available at: https://mercyforanimals.org/blog/veal-isnt-the-only-baby-animal-we-eat/. Access: 28 Feb. 2026.
MACEDO, Julia; CASTRO, Fábio. Filhote de onça que era criado como pet é transferido a recinto em Goiás. G1 Goiás e TV Anhanguera. Apr 4, 2025. Available at: https://g1.globo.com/go/goias/noticia/2025/04/04/filhote-de-onca-que-era-criado-como-pet-e-transferido-a-recinto-em-goias.ghtml. Access: 26 Feb. 2026.
MARCUSE, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press. 1968.
MASSON, Jeffrey M. Beasts: What animals can teach us about the origins of good and evil. New York: Bloomsbury. 2014.
MOUNK, Y., & NUSSBAUM, Martha. Martha Nussbaum on living (and eating) morally. Persuasion. 2024. Available at: https://www.persuasion.community/p/nussbaum. Access: 27 Feb. 2026.
MUREAU, Cyprian; D´OLIVEIRA, Léa; PEYRON, Odile, et al. 8,000 years of wild and domestic animal body size data reveal long-term synchrony and recent divergence due to intensified human impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), New Brunswick, v. 122, n. 36, e2503428122, sep. 2025. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2503428122. Access: 26 Feb. 2026. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2503428122
NIE, Yonggang., WEI, Fuwen., ZHOU, Wenliang, et al. Giant pandas are macronutritional carnivores. Current Biology, London, v. 29, n. 10, p. 1677–1682, may.2019. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982219303951. Access: 26 Feb. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.067.
ODUM, Eugene P. Ecologia. Rio de Janeiro: Interamericana. 1985.
PARE, Sascha. Orcas are learning terrifying new behaviors. Are they getting smarter? Live Science. Oct 22, 2023. Available at: https://www.livescience.com/animals/orcas/orcas-are-learning-terrifying-new-behaviors-are-they-getting-smarter. Access: 27 Feb. 2026.
REGAN, Tom. Defending animal rights. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. 2001.
RYDER, Richard. Speciesism, Painism and Happiness-a morality for the twenty-first century. Exeter: Societas. 2011.
SCHEFLER, William C. Biology: Principles and issues. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 1976.
SCRUTON, Roger; TYLER, Andrew. Do animals have rights? Debate. The Ecologist, London, v.31, n.2, p. 20-23, mar, 2001.
SINGER, Peter. Practical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1979.
SINGER, Peter. Vida ética: Os melhores ensaios do mais polêmico filósofo da atualidade. Rio de Janeiro: Ediouro. 2002.
SOLOMON, Maurice. Dinâmica de populações. São Paulo: EPU. 1980.
STEINBAUER, Anja. Interview – Roger Scruton. Philosophy Now: A Magazine of Ideas. n.d. Available at: https://philosophynow.org/issues/27/Roger_Scruton. Access: 27 Feb. 2026.
TAYLOR, Paul. The ethics of respect for nature. Environmental Ethics, v. 3, n. 3, p. 197-218, 1981. Available at: https://rintintin.colorado.edu/~vancecd/phil308/Taylor.pdf. Access: 01 mar. 2026.
TAYLOR, Paul. Respect for nature: a theory of environmental ethics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 1987.
TOLEDO, Luiz Fernando. Os influencers que ganham fama exibindo animais selvagens como pets. BBC-Brasil. May 26, 2025. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/c74nw400191o. Access: 27 Feb. 2026.
TORRES ALDAVE, Mikel. El fracaso de los argumentos contra la intervención en la naturaleza. In MESEGUER, Antonio C; MANZANERO FERNÁNDEZ, Delia (Org.) Actas I Congreso internacional de la Red española de Filosofía, v. XVIII, p. 39-53, 2015. Red Española de Filosofia. https://redfilosofia.es/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2015/06/6.gm_hache@yahoo.es_.pdf. Access: 27 Feb. 2026.
VON UEXKÜLL, Jakob. A foray into the worlds of animals and humans: with a theory of meaning. O’NEIL, Joseph D. (Trad). Posthumanities, Vol. 12. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.
WISE, Steven. Animal rights, one step at a time. In: C. SUNSTEIN, Cass; NUSSBAUM, Martha (Ed.). Animal rights: Current debates and new directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, p. 19–50.
WWF. Living Planet Report 2024 – A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, Switzerland, 2024. https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/2024-living-planet-report/. Access: 2 Mar. 2026.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Brasileira de Direito Animal
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional que permite o compartilhamentodo trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
2. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
3. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado.
