(Re)producing the cis body
notes on the sex-gender binary in biomedical discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/peri.v1i20.54766Abstract
It was only in the 1990s that people with a sexual identity understood as normal by the biomedical discourse started being treated by a proper term: cisgender. Before that, however, subjects interpreted as abnormal were already named. The present work defends that the normal(ised) body can only exist from the negation and/or rejection of the other, a-normalised. Articulating a bibliographical review of genealogies about sexual binary to productions on gender from the queer theory perspective, it aims to analyse the supposed pre-discursiveness of cis identity, revealing it as an ontological self-attribution, which is, in fact, epistemologically unsustainable. That being said, it is concluded that we live in a contemporary somatopolitical era in which the technologies of (re)production of sex are used in order to reinscribe bodies in the dimorphic logic of sexual binarism and proposals in order to de-binary the biomedical discourse are made.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Patrick Braga

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License that allows the work to be shared with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal, but prohibits commercial use.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).