STATE, TERRITORY AND INTERETHNIC RELATIONS IN MULTICULTURAL CONTEXTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v38i0.65491Keywords:
Ethnicity, Ethnic groups, Interethnic field, Agency, Territory and solidarityAbstract
This article attempts to elucidate the importance of the relations of solidarity exercised in the interethnic field between black communities and indigenous peoples in Colombia as a trigger for key territorial agencies in the processes of social change and modernization of both the State and society. It is a way of understanding the emergence of new social relations and a world of life produced in the midst of the different graphs that mark the territory and that represent discourses that range from the places of enunciation of ethnic and racial groups, to the many political designs of the multicultural State. It is concluded that the relations of ethnic groups in Colombia, in situations of neighborhood, mark borders in which an interethnic world survives. A world of life and a system of kinship in zones of porous, fluid coexistence, and not always in harmony, but that define collective agencies.
Downloads
References
ARON, R. Alexis de Tocqueville. In: Aron. As etapas do pensamento sociológico. Rio do Janeiro: Martins Fontes, 1999.
BECK, Ulric. ¿Qué es la globalización? Falacias del globalismo, respuestas a la globalización, Barcelona: PAIDÓS. 2008.
BENDIX, R. Construção nacional e Ciudadanía. São Paulo: Edusp, 1996.
CASTELLS, M. The information age: Economy, society and culture, Volume II: Power of identity. Malden, MA: The Willey-Blackwell. 2010.
CASTILLO, L. C. El Estado Nación-Pluriétnico y multicultural colombiano: La lucha por el territorio en al reimaginación de la Nación y la reivindicación de la identidad étnica de negros e indígenas. 2006. Tesis (doctoral) – Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España, 2006.
DOMONT, Louis. Introduction to two Theories off Social Anthropology: Descent groups and Marriage Alliance. Oxford; New York: Berghahn, 2006.
EISENSTANDT, S. Multiple Modernities. Daedalvs, [s.l.], v. 129, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2000.
ELIAS, N. El proceso de la civilización: investigaciones sociogenéticas y psicogenéticas. México: Fondo de cultura económica, 2016.
GIDDENS, A. Vivir en una sociedad postradicional. In: BECK, Ulric; GIDDENS, Anthony; SCOTT, Lash. Modernización reflexiva. Política, tradición y estética en el orden social moderno. Traducción de Jesús Alborés, Madrid: [s.n.], 2001.
GIDDENS, A. Consecuencias de la modernidad. Madrid: Alianza, 1993.
GIDDENS, A. Modernidad e identidad del yo: el yo y la sociedad en la época contemporánea. Barcelona: Península, 1995.
GIDDENS, A. The globalization of modernity. In: HELD D.; MCGREW, A. The global transformations reader. An introduction the globalizastion debate. Cambrindge, UK: Polity press, 2005.
GODELIER, M. The metamorphose of kinship. London: verso books, 2011.
HABERMAS, J. Teoría de la acción comunicativa I: Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización social. Madrid, España: editorial Taurus, 1987.
HARVEY, D. Spaces of hope. Edimburgh: Edimburgh University press. 2000.
HARDT, M.; NEGRI, A. Globalization as empire. In: HELD, D.; MCGREW, A. The global transformations reader. An introduction the globalizastion debate. Cambrindge UK: Polity press. 2005.
HELD, D.; MCGREW, A.; GOLDBAT, D.; PARRATON, J. Rethinking globalitation. In: HELD, D.; MCGREW, A. (ed.). The global transformations reader. An introduction the globalizastion debate. Cambrindge UK: Polity press, 2005.
LOSONCZY, A. M. La trama interétnica. Ritual, sociedad y figura de intercambio entre los grupos negros y emberá del chocó. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología/ Instituto Francés de estudios Andinos, 2006.
MAYAL, J.; SIMPSON, M. Ethnicity is not Eunogh: reflections on protracted secessionism in the third world. In: SMITH, A. (ed.). Etnicity and nacionalism. New York: E. J. BRILL, 1992.
POMERANZ, K. The gran Divergence: China, Europa and the Making of the modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University press, 2000.
REIS, E.; MOORE, M. (ed.). Elite perception of poverty and inequality. New York: Zed Books, 2005.
REIS, E. Elites Agrarias, State Bulding e Autoritarismo. Dados, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 3, p. 331-348, 1982.
SACK, R. Conceptions of space insocial thought. A geographic perspective. London: The Macmillan press, 1980.
SACK, R. Human territoriality. Its theory and history, Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1986.
SAHLINS, M. Hiatorical Metamores and Mythical Realties: Structure in the Early History of the Sandwich Island Kingdon. Ann Abor: The University of Michigan, 2004.
SASSEN, S. Cartografías de la globalización. Género y ciudadanía en los circuitos transfronterizos, Madrid: traficante de sueños, 2003.
SASSEN, S. Expulsions. Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Boston, MA: Harvard College, 2014.
SASSEN, S. Territory, Autority, Rights. New Jercey: Princeton University, 2006.
SASSEN, S. The Global city. Ney york, London, Tokio; New Jersey: Princenton University Press, 1991.
SASSEN, S. Una sociología de la globalización. Buenos Aires: Katz editores, 2012.
SALAZAR, B.; CASTILLO, P. La Hora de los dinosaurios. Conflicto y depredación en Colombia. Cali: CIDSE, Universidad del Valle, 2001.
SCOTT, L. La reflexividad y sus dobles: estructura, ética, comunidad. In: BECK, U.; GIDDENS, A. SCOTT, L. Modernización reflexiva. Política, tradición y estética en el orden social moderno. Tradicción de Jesús Alborés. Madrid: Alianza editorial, 2001.
TRAUTMAN, T. The Whole history of Kinship Terminology in Three Chapters. Before Morgan, and after Morgan. Anthropological Theory, [s.l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 268-287, 2015.
WAGNER, P. A sociology of Modernity: Liberty and discipline. London: Roudledge, 1994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo da revista, exceto onde indicado de outra forma, é licenciado sob uma atribuição do tipo Creative Commons BY.
O periódico Caderno CRH on-line é aberto e gratuito.
