Homophobic amatonormativity in “Aqueles dois”, by Caio Fernando Abreu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/peri.v1i21.58614Abstract
Sustained by the monogamy system, the amatonormativity, according to Brake’s (2012) definition, assumes that a central, exclusive, and romantic relationship is “normal” and universally desired, relegating other affective relations to cultural invisibility. Based on this concept, it’s proposed an analysis of the short story “Aqueles dois”, included in Morangos mofados, by Caio Fernando Abreu, in which the affective relationship between two men is perceived according to the monogamous and homophobic view of the society represented in the narrative. The analysis aims to criticize the hierarchization of affections and the homophobic prejudice, in addition to investigate the operation of amatonormativity, all of which are necessary to the operation of the monogamy system. This essay was developed using as references the studies of Jenkins (2017), Núñez (2023) and Vasallo (2022), about monogamy, and the works of Barata (2018), Calegari (2009) and Camargo (2010), about the fictional production of the Brazilian writer.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luiz Gustavo Osório Xavier

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License that allows the work to be shared with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal, but prohibits commercial use.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal website) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes and increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).